<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>sidefumbling &#187; Outlook 2003</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.flobee.net/category/outlook/outlook-2003/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.flobee.net</link>
	<description>The consequence of not having six hydrocoptic marzelvanes.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 18:39:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Finally, a replacement for Lookout, aptly named Lookeen</title>
		<link>http://www.flobee.net/finally-a-replacement-for-lookout-aptly-named-lookeen/</link>
		<comments>http://www.flobee.net/finally-a-replacement-for-lookout-aptly-named-lookeen/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 18:20:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Outlook 2003]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Outlook 2007]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flobee.net/?p=251</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After Microsoft bought Lookout, by far the best Outlook indexer, they incorporated its functionality into Windows Desktop Search.&#160; WDS is a horrible app, in my opinion.&#160; Microsoft chose to intentionally disallow Lookout as an add-in in Outlook 2007.&#160; I have tried other indexers that work with Outlook, but none could compare to the efficient and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After Microsoft bought Lookout, by far the best Outlook indexer, they incorporated its functionality into Windows Desktop Search.&nbsp; WDS is a horrible app, in my opinion.&nbsp; Microsoft chose to intentionally disallow Lookout as an add-in in Outlook 2007.&nbsp; I have tried other indexers that work with Outlook, but none could compare to the efficient and fast Lookout.&nbsp; I settled on <a target="_blank" href="http://www.caelo.com/products/features.php">Nelson Email Organizer</a> (NEO), which is a standalone application.&nbsp; It does do some nice things, but it just isn&#8217;t the same.</p>
<p>A successor to Lookout has found: <a target="_blank" href="http://www.lookeen.net/">Lookeen</a>.&nbsp; Like Lookout, it is a COM add-in just for indexing your mailbox (not a bloated app that also indexes your mailbox).&nbsp; It is very fast, and offers a nice feature that Lookout never did: it display results in a tabbed window, so you can view results by their item type (messages, appointments, contacts, files, etc.).&nbsp; Lookeen is in beta right now, but you can <a target="_blank" href="http://www.lookeen.net/getitnow/index.php">download</a> it and give it a try.&nbsp; I haven&#8217;t tried any complex searches, but my early results are very positive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.flobee.net/finally-a-replacement-for-lookout-aptly-named-lookeen/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Limitation using automatic formatting in all versions of Outlook</title>
		<link>http://www.flobee.net/limitation-using-automatic-formatting-in-all-versions-of-outlook/</link>
		<comments>http://www.flobee.net/limitation-using-automatic-formatting-in-all-versions-of-outlook/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 15:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Outlook 2003]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Outlook 2007]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flobee.net/?p=248</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is a limitation in the use of automatic formatting to control how a message is displayed in a folder&#8217;s message list.&#160; I had been trying to use automatic formatting to change the color of messages in a particular folder if they contain a certain word in the body.&#160; I have a rule that moves [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a limitation in the use of automatic formatting to control how a message is displayed in a folder&#8217;s message list.&nbsp; I had been trying to use automatic formatting to change the color of messages in a particular folder if they contain a certain word in the body.&nbsp; I have a rule that moves some daily reports I receive into the folder, and rather than open each report if nothing has changed in the results of the report since it last ran, I wanted to have messages that contain a word that is in them when they have been updated to display differently.&nbsp; This way I can simply delete the reports with unchanged data, but still open them if I want to (which is why I am not using a rule to delete them upon arrival).</p>
<p>However, the automatic formatting was not being applied to messages that contained the keyword.&nbsp; I tried several different ways within the conditions editor of applying the formatting, all with the same results.&nbsp; I decided to open a case with Microsoft since we have loads of Premier incidents available to use.&nbsp; I had to work through several engineers until I finally got to the Outlook development team who had to look at the source code to determine why it wasn&#8217;t working.</p>
<p>That is when they discovered the culprit: a limitation that is by design.&nbsp; When using automatic formatting, only the first 256 characters of the message body will be searched.&nbsp; This is for performance reasons.&nbsp; I couldn&#8217;t understand why this would be the case since rules will search all of a message body.&nbsp; Then I realized why and it does make sense:&nbsp; Automatic formatting is part of the view for a folder.&nbsp; Views are calculated and applied each time you switch to that folder, so displaying the font face/color/size and bold/italics of each message in the folder list is dynamically applied each time you switch to the folder.&nbsp; The default automatic formatting rules for a folder include unread, overdue, and expired messages, plus group headers, etc.&nbsp; There is definitely a performance risk if Outlook had to search the entire message body of every message in a folder to determine how it should be displayed.&nbsp; To mitigate this, message body searches are limited to 256 characters when part of automatic formatting.</p>
<p>Rules aren&#8217;t subject to this limitation because they are one-time processes.&nbsp; Rules are applied only when a message arrives or is sent (or when you manually run one).&nbsp; So the workaround for my issue is to use a rule to search the body for a keyword, assign a category to it if there is a match, and then move it to the folder.&nbsp; I then use automatic formatting to change how a message is displayed if the category is the one I assigned.&nbsp; I have to create a rule for each keyword I am looking for (since I am also looking for reports that have errors), which isn&#8217;t as efficient as defining multiple automatic formatting rules, but it is an acceptable workaround since the results are the same.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.flobee.net/limitation-using-automatic-formatting-in-all-versions-of-outlook/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
